Results of college football union vote not expected soon

April 24, 2014 - by: Tammy Binford 0 COMMENTS

In a first-of-its-kind election, select athletes at Northwestern University are set to cast ballots on April 25 to decide whether they want union representation. The vote will be complete in one day, but results of the election may be a long time coming.

Never before have college athletes been considered eligible to unionize, but a March 26 ruling from Peter Sung Ohr, the Chicago regional director of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), said scholarship football players at the private university in Evanston, Illinois, are essentially employees of the school and are therefore eligible to unionize.

read more…

Northwestern’s appeal of football ruling claims NLRB ignored evidence

April 10, 2014 - by: Tammy Binford 0 COMMENTS

Northwestern University’s appeal of a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruling claims an NLRB regional director ignored evidence that the school’s scholarship football players are students—not employees—and relied too much on the testimony of a single player.

On April 9, the private university located in Evanston, Illinois, asked the full NLRB to review and overturn the March 26 ruling by NLRB regional director Peter Sung Ohr. That ruling said the university’s scholarship football players are employees and are therefore eligible to vote on union representation. The NLRB has set a union election for April 25. The Board may postpone the election in light of the appeal, but it doesn’t have to.

read more…

NLRB resurrects proposal on speeding up union elections

February 05, 2014 - by: Tammy Binford 0 COMMENTS

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is reprising its 2011 effort to change the rules related to union representation—an effort that sparked opposition from employers then and will surely do so again.

A statement from the NLRB says that in substance, the proposed amendments are identical to the representation procedure changes first put forth in June 2011. The proposed amendments were struck down in 2012 when a federal district court judge in Washington, D.C., cited the lack of an NLRB quorum.

read more…

Senate ready to take up NLRB nominations

July 25, 2013 - by: Tammy Binford 0 COMMENTS

by Tammy Binford

The full Senate is expected to vote on all five nominations to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) within the next few days, a move that could give the NLRB its full membership confirmed by the Senate for the first time in more than a decade.

The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions held a hearing on the nominations of Democrats Kent Hirozawa and Nancy Schiffer on July 23, and on July 24, it voted 13-9 to send their nominations to the full Senate.

read more…

High court agrees to hear NLRB recess appointments case

June 24, 2013 - by: HR Hero 0 COMMENTS

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal in Noel Canning v. NLRB.

In the Noel Canning case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that three of President Barack Obama’s so-called recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) were unconstitutional. Without the three appointees, the Board lacked a necessary quorum to act. Thus, the D.C. Circuit’s ruling raised questions about the validity of hundreds of NLRB actions, including union-friendly decisions on social media, confidentiality rules, and off-duty employees’ access to workplaces.

The U.S. Constitution provides that the Senate must consent to the president’s nominees to federal agencies. The Constitution gives the president the authority to fill vacancies that “may happen” during the Senate’s recess that “shall expire at the end of the next session.”

read more…

Another NLRB recess appointment ruled invalid

May 20, 2013 - by: Tammy Binford 0 COMMENTS

Nearly four months after an appeals court ruled that recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) made in 2012 were invalid, another appellate court has ruled a previous recess appointment unconstitutional.

The U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled May 16 in NLRB v. New Vista Nursing & Rehab. that President Barack Obama’s 2010 recess appointment of Craig Becker to the NLRB was invalid. Becker, a Democrat, served on the Board from April 5, 2010, through January 3, 2012.

read more…

Obama urges swift confirmation of new NLRB nominees

April 09, 2013 - by: Tammy Binford 0 COMMENTS

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), crippled by a January court ruling against two recess appointees, has the potential to get back to full strength if the Senate confirms nominations President Barack Obama made April 9. Previous attempts to fill the NLRB have failed over congressional opposition to Board actions and Obama’s nominees.

On April 9, Obama nominated Republicans Harry I. Johnson, III, and Philip A. Miscimarra along with Democrat Mark Gaston Pearce. Pearce is the current NLRB chair. His term is set to expire August 27. Johnson and Miscimarra are both management-side employment attorneys.

read more…

NLRB wants Supreme Court review of recess appointments decision

March 14, 2013 - by: Tammy Binford 0 COMMENTS

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) announced on March 12 it will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review an appeals court decision that says the appointment of two Board members is invalid.

In consultation with the Justice Department, the NLRB said it intends to file a petition by the April 25 deadline for Supreme Court review.

On January 25, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Noel Canning v. NLRB that President Barack Obama acted unconstitutionally when he made three recess appointments to the Board on January 4, 2012.

read more…

NLRB ruling ends proemployer automatic exemption

December 31, 2012 - by: Tammy Binford 0 COMMENTS

A recent ruling from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) means employers are no longer automatically exempted when unions ask them to turn over witness statements related to employee discipline.

Now, the employer’s confidentiality interest must be balanced with the union’s need for information. The American Baptist Homes of the West d/b/a Piedmont Gardens case overruled the Board’s 1978 decision in Anheuser-Busch, Inc., which established a categorical exemption for witness statements in such cases.

In the Piedmont case, the NLRB’s acting general counsel and the charging party argued that the bright-line rule established in 1978 was “inappropriate.” The Board agreed, finding it should instead apply a balancing test articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Detroit Edison Co. v. NLRB, which was decided in 1979.

read more…

Company Settles Facebook Firing Case Initiated by NLRB

February 08, 2011 - by: HR Hero 2 COMMENTS

The case involving an employee who was discharged after posting disparaging comments about her supervisor on her Facebook page has been settled, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) announced in a news release yesterday. The NLRB caused a wave of unease among employers when it filed the case against American Medical Response of Connecticut, Inc. (AMR), on October 27, 2010.

The NLRB complaint asserted that AMR violated the National Labor Relations Act when it discharged Dawnmarie Souza for posting comments about her boss on her Facebook page and responding to related comments posted by her coworkers because such activity was protected. The complaint also claimed that AMR maintained “overly broad” rules on blogging, posting on the Internet, and communications between employees in its employee handbook and alleged that AMR illegally denied Souza union representation during an investigatory interview.

read more…

Categories: NLRB / NLRB Decisions

Tags: , ,

 Page 1 of 2  1  2 »