Court expedites appeal of overtime rule injunction

December 09, 2016 - by: Kate McGovern Tornone 0 COMMENTS

A federal appeals court will review the temporary injunction blocking new overtime regulations on an expedited schedule that wraps things up even faster than the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) had requested. But it still won’t reach a decision until after President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration, and that could mean the end of the overtime rule, according to some experts.

The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals granted the DOL’s motion for expedited review December 8. The court scheduled most briefing deadlines as the DOL had requested, but it slated final briefs for January 31 rather than the proposed February 7.

That still puts the court’s decision after the inauguration, and some experts have suggested that a Trump DOL would drop the appeal. Michelle Lee Flores, a member of Cozen O’Connor and a contributor to California Employment Law Letter, says that’s a real possibility.

If the DOL dropped the appeal, it would be up to the lower court to decide whether to issue a permanent injunction and kill the rules for good. Based on the judge’s strong language—he called the rule “unlawful”—experts have said he’d likely go through with it.

The plaintiffs, a group of 21 states, had argued against the expedited schedule, alleging that the DOL was actually requesting an extension under the guise of a request to speed things up. “Appellants’ motion actually asks for extra time to file their reply brief—21 days instead of the standard 14,” the states said. “So with regard to the briefing schedule, Appellants’ motion to expedite does not ask this Court to do anything that Appellants could not do on their own volition, except extend the briefing schedule for Appellants’ reply brief.” The states also suggested that the DOL’s move may have been designed to prevent them from seeking an extension for filing their own briefs during the holidays.

It does appear the DOL was requesting more time, Flores said. “It looks like what they were asking for actually was extended and the court shortened it to [a normal reply date],” she said.

And while the court didn’t immediately schedule oral arguments, Flores said that February 7, a week after final briefs are due, could be a reasonable estimate.

About Kate McGovern Tornone:
Kate Tornone is an editor at BLR. She has almost 10 years’ experience covering a variety of employment law topics. Before coming to BLR, she served as editor of Thompson Information Services’ ADA and FLSA publications, coauthored the Guide to the ADA Amendments Act, and published several special reports. She graduated from The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., with a bachelor of arts in media studies. Kate can be reached at
Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Currently there are no comments related to this article. You have a special honor to be the first commenter. Thanks!

Leave a Reply